
Core i5-3475S vs Celeron G6900E

Core i5-3475S

Celeron G6900E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i5-3475S is positioned at rank #859 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3475S
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-3475S | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($53) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-3475S | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+27%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($53) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3475S and Celeron G6900E

Core i5-3475S
The Core i5-3475S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,315 points. Launch price was $219.

Celeron G6900E
The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3475S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G6900E offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-3475S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3475S versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3475S (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-3475S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G6900E uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3475S scores 4,315 against the Celeron G6900E's 4,272 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-3475S. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 705 vs 1,563, a 75.7% lead for the Celeron G6900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,544 vs 2,631 (52.1% advantage for the Celeron G6900E). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3475S vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E.
| Feature | Core i5-3475S | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 22 nm | 10 nm-55% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 4,315+1% | 4,272 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 705 | 1,563+122% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,544 | 2,631+70% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3475S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3475S versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900E — the Celeron G6900E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-3475S) vs 20 (Celeron G6900E) — the Celeron G6900E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3475S) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E).
| Feature | Core i5-3475S | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR5-4800+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3475S) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900E). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3475S) and UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3475S targets Budget, Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3475S rivals FX-6300; Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Core i5-3475S | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-3475S launched at $249 MSRP, while the Celeron G6900E debuted at $53. At current prices ($42 vs $53), the Core i5-3475S is $11 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3475S delivers 102.7 pts/$ vs 80.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900E — making the Core i5-3475S the 24.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3475S | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $53-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $42-21% | $53 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.7+27% | 80.6 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











