Core i5-4200M
VS
A8-5600K

Core i5-4200M vs A8-5600K

Intel

Core i5-4200M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A8-5600K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4200M is positioned at rank 1025 and the A8-5600K is on rank 437, so the A8-5600K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200M

#1013
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2351%
#1014
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2317%
#1015
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2127%
#1016
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2117%
#1017
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2098%
#1019
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2026%
#1020
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1942%
#1021
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1939%
#1022
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1887%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
95%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5600K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6539%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6179%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4486%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1352%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1071%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
937%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
536%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
529%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
482%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
482%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
477%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
464%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
457%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
455%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
451%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
99%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
99%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
98%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
97%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
97%
#437
A8-5600K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
98%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
96%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
95%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-5600K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-4200M in both compute-intensive tasks (1.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-4200MA8-5600K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-4200MA8-5600K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4200M and A8-5600K

Intel

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

AMD

A8-5600K

The A8-5600K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,860 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-5600K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M versus 3.9 GHz on the A8-5600K — a 22.9% clock advantage for the A8-5600K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-4200M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A8-5600K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200M scores 2,809 against the A8-5600K's 2,860 — a 1.8% lead for the A8-5600K. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M vs 0 kB on the A8-5600K.

FeatureCore i5-4200MA8-5600K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz+26%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,809
2,860+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-5600K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200M versus 1866 on the A8-5600K — the A8-5600K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-5600K supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i5-4200MA8-5600K
Socket
PGA946
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+52428700%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A8-5600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M) vs true (A8-5600K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4200M) and Radeon HD 7560D (A8-5600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-5600K rivals Core i3-3220.

FeatureCore i5-4200MA8-5600K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Radeon HD 7560D
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Mobile