Core i5-4200M vs Core 2 Duo P8700
Core i5-4200M
Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4200M is positioned at rank 1025 and the Core 2 Duo P8700 is on rank 140, so the Core 2 Duo P8700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200M
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-4200M | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) | ✅ More affordable ($85) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-4200M | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+164%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) | ✅ More affordable ($85) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4200M and Core 2 Duo P8700
Core i5-4200M
The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.
Core 2 Duo P8700
The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4200M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core i5-4200M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200M scores 2,809 against the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2,805 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4200M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+23% | 2.53 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.53 GHz+1% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 3 MB+500% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,809 | 2,805 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4200M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200M versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — the Core 2 Duo P8700 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4200M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-4200M) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo P8700) — the Core i5-4200M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | 1066+35433% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+419430300% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M) vs true (Core 2 Duo P8700). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-4200M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 debuted at $241.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-7% | $241 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $85 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-4200M and Core 2 Duo P8700
