Core i5-6360U vs FX-4170

Core i5-6360U vs FX-4170 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-6360U

2 / 4

3,112

0.0%

3,121

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-6360U vs FX-4170 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-6360U vs FX-4170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-6360U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4170 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,112 vs 3,121).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌309.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 125W.

FX-4170

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 125W instead of 512W, a 387W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $157 MSRP, while Core i5-6360U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4170 better than Core i5-6360U?

Yes. FX-4170 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-4170 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4170 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4170 is the better buy right now. FX-4170 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $157 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6360U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-6360U vs FX-4170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-6360U

The Core i5-6360U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $304.

FX-4170

The FX-4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,121 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-6360U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4170 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4170 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-6360U versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-4170 — a 32.4% clock advantage for the FX-4170 (base: 2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i5-6360U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4170 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6360U scores 3,112 against the FX-4170's 3,121 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-4170. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-6360U vs 8192 kB on the FX-4170.

Feature	Core i5-6360U	FX-4170
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4.3 GHz+39%
Base Clock	2 GHz	4.2 GHz+110%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8192 kB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	3,112	3,121

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6360U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4170 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.