PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-750 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-750 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-750

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,546 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($210 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +265.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
✅Delivers 953.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-750?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 265.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 883.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 265.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 883.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $14 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $210 MSRP, and it still gives you a 265.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 953.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2009), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1156, 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-750 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-750

The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-750 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-750 scores 2,546 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 163.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 424 vs 2,407, a 140.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i5-750	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	10 / 16+150%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+6%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	45 nm	Intel 7 nm-84%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	2,546	25,029+883%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	424	2,407+468%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-750 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-750 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-750) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i5-750	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1156	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+260%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	192 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-750	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-750 was priced at $210, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($210 vs $196), Core i5-13400F was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-750 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 165.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-750	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$210	$196-7%
Performance per Dollar	12.1	127.7+955%
Release Date	2009	2023

Search Core i5-750 on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.