Core i5-760
VS
A6-7310

Core i5-760 vs A6-7310

Intel

Core i5-760

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A6-7310

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-760 is positioned at rank 973 and the A6-7310 is on rank 502, so the A6-7310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-760

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26872%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25391%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18436%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5554%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4399%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3849%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2204%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2176%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1981%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1981%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1959%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1906%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1879%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1871%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1854%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
100%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
100%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
98%
#976
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#977
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
96%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
95%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
95%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
95%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
94%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
94%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
93%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
92%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
91%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
91%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7310

#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
99%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
97%
#490
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
655%
#491
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
645%
#492
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
592%
#493
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
589%
#494
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
584%
#496
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
564%
#497
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
541%
#498
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
540%
#499
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
525%
#502
A6-7310
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-760 leads in gaming performance. However, the A6-7310 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-760A6-7310
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-760A6-7310
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-760 and A6-7310

Intel

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

AMD

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-760 and A6-7310 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 versus 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 — a 32.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-760 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A6-7310 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-760 scores 2,667 against the A6-7310's 2,689 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-7310.

FeatureCore i5-760A6-7310
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz+39%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+40%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark
2,667
2,689
Geekbench 6 Single
470
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-760 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-7310 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 versus 1600 on the A6-7310 — the A6-7310 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-760) vs 1 (A6-7310). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760) and FT3b,FP4 (A6-7310).

FeatureCore i5-760A6-7310
Socket
LGA1156
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+104857500%
16
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760) vs true (A6-7310). The A6-7310 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4 Graphics), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970; A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700.

FeatureCore i5-760A6-7310
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon R4 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Legacy Desktop