Core i5-L16G7
VS
A10 PRO-7800B

Core i5-L16G7 vs A10 PRO-7800B

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 3 GHz2020
VS
AMD

A10 PRO-7800B

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-L16G7 is positioned at rank 1040 and the A10 PRO-7800B is on rank 320, so the A10 PRO-7800B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-L16G7

#1028
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2514%
#1029
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2477%
#1030
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2274%
#1031
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2264%
#1032
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2243%
#1034
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2166%
#1035
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2077%
#1036
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2074%
#1037
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2018%
#1040
Core i5-L16G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10 PRO-7800B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4699%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4440%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3224%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
971%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
769%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
673%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
385%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
380%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
346%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
346%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
333%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
329%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
327%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
324%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
99%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
99%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
99%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
97%
#320
A10 PRO-7800B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-L16G7 (2020) utilizes 10 nm technology and LPDDR4X-4267, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-L16G7A10 PRO-7800B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10 PRO-7800B (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-L16G7A10 PRO-7800B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-L16G7 and A10 PRO-7800B

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-L16G7 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the A10 PRO-7800B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B — a 26.1% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-L16G7 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the A10 PRO-7800B uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-L16G7 scores 3,280 against the A10 PRO-7800B's 3,317 — a 1.1% lead for the A10 PRO-7800B.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7A10 PRO-7800B
Cores / Threads
5 / 5+25%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.9 GHz+30%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+150%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
4096 kB+700%
Process
10 nm-64%
28 nm
Architecture
Lakefield (2020)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
3,280
3,317+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
446
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-L16G7 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10 PRO-7800B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-L16G7 versus DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7800B — the Core i5-L16G7 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 PRO-7800B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 9 (Core i5-L16G7) vs 16 (A10 PRO-7800B) — the A10 PRO-7800B offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7A10 PRO-7800B
Socket
FC-CSP1016
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4x-4267+33%
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7) vs AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (Core i5-L16G7) and Radeon R7 (A10 PRO-7800B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile, A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7A10 PRO-7800B
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
Business Desktop