Core i5-L16G7
VS
Core i3-4360T

Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i3-4360T

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i3-4360T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-L16G7 is positioned at rank 1040 and the Core i3-4360T is on rank 709, so the Core i3-4360T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-L16G7

#1028
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2514%
#1029
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2477%
#1030
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2274%
#1031
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2264%
#1032
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2243%
#1034
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2166%
#1035
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2077%
#1036
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2074%
#1037
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2018%
#1040
Core i5-L16G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4360T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13059%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12339%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8959%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2699%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2138%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1870%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1071%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1057%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
963%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
963%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
952%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
926%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
913%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
909%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
901%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
100%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
100%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
100%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
99%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
99%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
98%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
98%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
98%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
98%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
98%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
98%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
98%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
98%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
97%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
97%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-L16G7 (2020) utilizes 10 nm technology and LPDDR4X-4267, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-L16G7Core i3-4360T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-4360T (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-L16G7Core i3-4360T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-L16G7 and Core i3-4360T

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-L16G7 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i3-4360T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360T (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-L16G7 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-4360T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-L16G7 scores 3,280 against the Core i3-4360T's 3,294 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4360T. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Core i3-4360T
Cores / Threads
5 / 5+150%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
3.2 GHz+129%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Lakefield (2020)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,280
3,294
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-L16G7 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4360T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-L16G7 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360T — the Core i5-L16G7 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4360T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 9 (Core i5-L16G7) vs 16 (Core i3-4360T) — the Core i3-4360T offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Core i3-4360T
Socket
FC-CSP1016
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4x-4267+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (Core i5-L16G7) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile, Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Core i3-4360T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
Desktop