Core i5-L16G7
VS
Core i3-6100E

Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i3-6100E

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i3-6100E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-L16G7 is positioned at rank 1040 and the Core i3-6100E is on rank 902, so the Core i3-6100E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-L16G7

#1028
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2514%
#1029
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2477%
#1030
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2274%
#1031
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2264%
#1032
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2243%
#1034
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2166%
#1035
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2077%
#1036
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2074%
#1037
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2018%
#1040
Core i5-L16G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6100E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21162%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14519%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4374%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3031%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1736%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1713%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1560%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1560%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1542%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1501%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1480%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1474%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1460%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
100%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
98%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
98%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
96%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
96%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
96%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
96%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-L16G7 (2020) utilizes 10 nm technology and LPDDR4X-4267, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-L16G7Core i3-6100E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6100E (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and LPDDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-L16G7Core i3-6100E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-L16G7 and Core i3-6100E

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i3-6100E

The Core i3-6100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,315 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core i5-L16G7 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i3-6100E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100E — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-L16G7. The Core i5-L16G7 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-6100E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-L16G7 scores 3,280 against the Core i3-6100E's 3,315 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-6100E. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-L16G7 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6100E.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Core i3-6100E
Cores / Threads
5 / 5+150%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz+11%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Lakefield (2020)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
3,280
3,315+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 2133 on the Core i3-6100E — the Core i3-6100E supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-6100E supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 9 (Core i5-L16G7) vs 16 (Core i3-6100E) — the Core i3-6100E offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Core i3-6100E
Socket
FC-CSP1016
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4x-4267
2133+53225%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+13107100%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7) vs true (Core i3-6100E). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (Core i5-L16G7) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6100E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-L16G7Core i3-6100E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Mobile