CPU
GPU
Core i5-L16G7
A8-7670K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-L16G7 is positioned at rank 1040 and the A8-7670K is on rank 628, so the A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-L16G7
Performance Per Dollar A8-7670K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-L16G7 | A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($43) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-L16G7 | A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($43) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-L16G7 and A8-7670K
Core i5-L16G7
The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.
A8-7670K
The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
The Core i5-L16G7 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the A8-7670K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K — a 26.1% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-L16G7 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the A8-7670K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-L16G7 scores 3,280 against the A8-7670K's 3,267 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-L16G7.
| Feature | Core i5-L16G7 | A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 5+25% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+157% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 4096 kB+700% |
| Process | 10 nm-64% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Lakefield (2020) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 3,280 | 3,267 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-L16G7 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-7670K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 2133 on the A8-7670K — the A8-7670K supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7670K supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 9 (Core i5-L16G7) vs 16 (A8-7670K) — the A8-7670K offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-L16G7 | A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FC-CSP1016 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4x-4267 | 2133+53225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+13107100% | 64 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Only the A8-7670K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7) vs true (A8-7670K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i5-L16G7) and Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7670K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.
| Feature | Core i5-L16G7 | A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-L16G7 and A8-7670K
