Core i7-1060G7 vs Athlon II X4 641
Core i7-1060G7
Athlon II X4 641
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-1060G7 is positioned at rank 1197 and the Athlon II X4 641 is on rank 733, so the Athlon II X4 641 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-1060G7
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 641
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-1060G7 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake (Client) (2019) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-1060G7 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1060G7 and Athlon II X4 641
Core i7-1060G7
The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon II X4 641
The Athlon II X4 641 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,313 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1060G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Athlon II X4 641's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 641 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-1060G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Athlon II X4 641 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060G7 scores 2,322 against the Athlon II X4 641's 2,313 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-1060G7. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 641.
| Feature | Core i7-1060G7 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+36% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.8 GHz+180% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 2,322 | 2,313 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,523 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1060G7 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 641 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i7-1060G7 versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 641 — the Core i7-1060G7 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X4 641 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Ice Lake-Y (Core i7-1060G7) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 641).
| Feature | Core i7-1060G7 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FM1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733+33% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7) / not specified (Athlon II X4 641). The Core i7-1060G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics), while the Athlon II X4 641 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.
| Feature | Core i7-1060G7 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Premium Ultrabook | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-1060G7 and Athlon II X4 641
