Core i7-1060G7
VS
Core i3-6102E

Core i7-1060G7 vs Core i3-6102E

Intel

Core i7-1060G7

4 Cores8 Thrd9 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i3-6102E

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-1060G7 is positioned at rank 1197 and the Core i3-6102E is on rank 989, so the Core i3-6102E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-1060G7

#1185
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5383%
#1186
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5305%
#1187
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4870%
#1188
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4848%
#1189
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4803%
#1191
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4639%
#1192
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4448%
#1193
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4440%
#1194
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4321%
#1197
Core i7-1060G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
94%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
94%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
93%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
90%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6102E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29858%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
28213%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20485%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6171%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4276%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2449%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2417%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2201%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2201%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2176%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2117%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2088%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2079%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2061%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
100%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
98%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
98%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
98%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
98%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
97%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
96%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
93%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
91%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
90%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-1060G7 (2019) utilizes 10 nm technology and LPDDR4-3733, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-1060G7Core i3-6102E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Ice Lake (Client) (2019) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6102E (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and LPDDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-1060G7Core i3-6102E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1060G7 and Core i3-6102E

Intel

Core i7-1060G7

The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-6102E

The Core i3-6102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core i7-1060G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-6102E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-1060G7 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-6102E — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7. The Core i7-1060G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-6102E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060G7 scores 2,322 against the Core i3-6102E's 2,349 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-6102E. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6102E.

FeatureCore i7-1060G7Core i3-6102E
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+100%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+167%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake (Client) (2019)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,322
2,349+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,523
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both support up to LPDDR4-3733 memory speed. The Core i3-6102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-1060G7Core i3-6102E
Socket
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-3733
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-1060G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6102E). Both include integrated graphics Iris Plus Graphics (Core i7-1060G7) and HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6102E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook, Core i3-6102E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.

FeatureCore i7-1060G7Core i3-6102E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus Graphics
HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Premium Ultrabook
Embedded