
Core i7-10700

Ryzen 5 3600
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($365 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $166 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 12,250).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700
The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-10700 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700 scores 16,067 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 9.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,250 vs 9,500 (25.3% advantage for the Core i7-10700). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,597 vs 1,295, a 20.9% lead for the Core i7-10700 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,926 vs 1,898 (122.7% advantage for the Core i7-10700). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 16,067 | 17,685+10% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,250+29% | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,597+23% | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,926+318% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i7-10700 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-10700) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B460,H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i7-10700) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200+9% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Core i7-10700 includes integrated graphics (UHD 630), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-10700 was priced at $365, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($365 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $166 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700 delivers 44.0 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 67.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $365 | $199-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.0 | 88.9+102% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













