
Core i7-1160G7

Xeon E5-2630L v3
Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-2630L v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-2630L v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-2630L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-1160G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon E5-2630L v3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630L v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630L v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2630L v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2630L v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,611 vs 8,720).
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1160G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1160G7 better than Xeon E5-2630L v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-2630L v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1160G7
The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E5-2630L v3
The Xeon E5-2630L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,611 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1160G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630L v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2630L v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630L v3 — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-1160G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2630L v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1160G7 scores 8,720 against the Xeon E5-2630L v3's 8,611 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-1160G7. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630L v3.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Xeon E5-2630L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+52% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 8,720+1% | 8,611 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,758 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1160G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2630L v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Xeon E5-2630L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1598 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4x-4267 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7) / not specified (Xeon E5-2630L v3). The Core i7-1160G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E5-2630L v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Xeon E5-2630L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Premium Ultrabook/Tablet | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













