Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-4650

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-4650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1160G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,190 less on MSRP ($426 MSRP vs $3,616 MSRP).
✅Delivers 760.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $3,616 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon E5-4650 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-4650

2012

Why buy it

✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,599 vs 8,720).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($3,616 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1160G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1160G7 better than Xeon E5-4650?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4650 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1160G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1160G7 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1160G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1160G7 is the better buy right now. Core i7-1160G7 comes in $3,190 cheaper on MSRP at $426 MSRP versus $3,616 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 760.8% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 2.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1160G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E5-4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1160G7

The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E5-4650

The Xeon E5-4650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,599 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1160G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-1160G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1160G7 scores 8,720 against the Xeon E5-4650's 8,599 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-1160G7. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Xeon E5-4650
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+33%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.7 GHz+125%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	8,720+1%	8,599
Geekbench 6 Single	1,758	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1160G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Xeon E5-4650
Socket	FCBGA1598	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650). The Core i7-1160G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E5-4650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Xeon E5-4650
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Premium Ultrabook/Tablet	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-1160G7 was priced at $426, while the Xeon E5-4650 came in at $3616. On launch pricing ($426 vs $3616), Core i7-1160G7 was $3190 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-1160G7 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4650 — making the Core i7-1160G7 the 158.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Xeon E5-4650
MSRP	$426-88%	$3616
Performance per Dollar	20.5+754%	2.4
Release Date	2020	2012

Search Core i7-1160G7 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.