PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-1195G7

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-4640 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,426 vs 7,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-4640 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+29% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1195G7 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,859 MSRP, while Core i7-1195G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1195G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-1195G7

2021

Xeon E5-4640 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-4640 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+29% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,426 vs 7,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1195G7 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,859 MSRP, while Core i7-1195G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1195G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1195G7 better than Xeon E5-4640 v3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4640 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1195G7 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4640 v3 is the better fit. You are getting 29% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1195G7 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4640 v3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-1195G7 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,859 MSRP, and it gives you a 28.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-4640 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 29% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon E5-4640 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1195G7 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-1195G7 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4640 v3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-1195G7	Xeon E5-4640 v3
1080p
low	262 FPS	159 FPS
medium	247 FPS	138 FPS
high	207 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	177 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	239 FPS	134 FPS
medium	191 FPS	113 FPS
high	155 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	167 FPS	62 FPS
medium	135 FPS	56 FPS
high	104 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i7-1195G7 Open Xeon E5-4640 v3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-1195G7	Xeon E5-4640 v3
1080p
low	262 FPS	193 FPS
medium	262 FPS	174 FPS
high	262 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	262 FPS	166 FPS
medium	262 FPS	153 FPS
high	254 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	251 FPS	109 FPS
medium	211 FPS	100 FPS
high	180 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	71 FPS

Open Core i7-1195G7 Open Xeon E5-4640 v3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-1195G7	Xeon E5-4640 v3
1080p
low	262 FPS	259 FPS
medium	262 FPS	259 FPS
high	262 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	262 FPS	259 FPS
medium	262 FPS	259 FPS
high	262 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	262 FPS	259 FPS
medium	262 FPS	259 FPS
high	262 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	259 FPS

Open Core i7-1195G7 Open Xeon E5-4640 v3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-1195G7	Xeon E5-4640 v3
1080p
low	262 FPS	259 FPS
medium	262 FPS	259 FPS
high	262 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	262 FPS	259 FPS
medium	262 FPS	259 FPS
high	262 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	262 FPS	259 FPS
medium	262 FPS	259 FPS
high	262 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	259 FPS

Open Core i7-1195G7 Open Xeon E5-4640 v3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1195G7 and Xeon E5-4640 v3

Core i7-1195G7

The Core i7-1195G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,472 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4640 v3

The Xeon E5-4640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,372 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1195G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-1195G7 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — a 63.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-1195G7 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i7-1195G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1195G7 scores 10,472 against the Xeon E5-4640 v3's 10,372 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-1195G7. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,930 vs 750, a 88.1% lead for the Core i7-1195G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,426 vs 7,000 (25.3% advantage for the Xeon E5-4640 v3). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1195G7 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640 v3.

Feature	Core i7-1195G7	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+92%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+53%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,472	10,372
Cinebench R23 Multi	6,806	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,930+157%	750
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,426	7,000+29%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1195G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 memory speed. The Xeon E5-4640 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-1195G7) vs 4 (Xeon E5-4640 v3). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-1195G7) vs 40 (Xeon E5-4640 v3) — the Xeon E5-4640 v3 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i7-1195G7) and C612 (Xeon E5-4640 v3).

Feature	Core i7-1195G7	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-1195G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1195G7) vs Yes (Xeon E5-4640 v3). The Core i7-1195G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1195G7 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-1195G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5700U.