PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13620H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,804).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Core i7-13620H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.

Core i7-13620H

2023

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,804).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Core i7-13620H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13620H better than Core i9-7920X?

Yes. Core i7-13620H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 36.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13620H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 36.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13620H is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13620H is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Core i7-13620H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,199 MSRP, and it gives you a 36.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-7920X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (19.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2066.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13620H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, 45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13620H Benchmark Check

Core i9-7920X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13620H	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	293 FPS	163 FPS
medium	269 FPS	142 FPS
high	229 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	241 FPS	140 FPS
medium	197 FPS	119 FPS
high	162 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	141 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	169 FPS	76 FPS
medium	138 FPS	70 FPS
high	107 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	43 FPS

Open Core i7-13620H Open Core i9-7920X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13620H	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	595 FPS	352 FPS
medium	519 FPS	300 FPS
high	426 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	243 FPS
1440p
low	532 FPS	315 FPS
medium	450 FPS	274 FPS
high	380 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	325 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	329 FPS	227 FPS
medium	281 FPS	201 FPS
high	258 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	162 FPS

Open Core i7-13620H Open Core i9-7920X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13620H	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	595 FPS	560 FPS
medium	595 FPS	468 FPS
high	595 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	366 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	507 FPS
medium	595 FPS	431 FPS
high	587 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	507 FPS	334 FPS
4K
low	595 FPS	390 FPS
medium	494 FPS	322 FPS
high	442 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	231 FPS

Open Core i7-13620H Open Core i9-7920X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13620H	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	595 FPS	588 FPS
medium	595 FPS	588 FPS
high	595 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	588 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	588 FPS
medium	595 FPS	588 FPS
high	595 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	502 FPS
4K
low	595 FPS	531 FPS
medium	557 FPS	480 FPS
high	502 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	366 FPS

Open Core i7-13620H Open Core i9-7920X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13620H and Core i9-7920X

Core i7-13620H

The Core i7-13620H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,804 points. Launch price was $502.

Core i9-7920X

The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13620H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-7920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13620H versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13620H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-13620H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-7920X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13620H scores 23,804 against the Core i9-7920X's 23,508 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-13620H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13620H vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X.

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Core i9-7920X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+11%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+45%	16.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	23,804+1%	23,508
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,176	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,859	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,766	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13620H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-7920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Core i9-7920X
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13620H) / not specified (Core i9-7920X). The Core i7-13620H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (64EU)), while the Core i9-7920X requires a dedicated GPU.