Core i7-13620H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Core i7-13620H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13620H

10 / 16

23,804

+0.1%

23,781

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13620H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13620H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13620H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (64EU), while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

2022

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,804).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13620H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13620H better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H?

Yes. Core i7-13620H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13620H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13620H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13620H still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-13620H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13620H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-13620H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13620H

The Core i7-13620H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,804 points. Launch price was $502.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13620H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13620H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13620H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13620H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13620H scores 23,804 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-13620H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13620H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm	6 nm-14%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark	23,804	23,781
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,176	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,859	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,766	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13620H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Socket	FCBGA1744	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13620H) / not specified (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H). The Core i7-13620H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (64EU)), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H requires a dedicated GPU.