Core i7-13620H vs Xeon W-1390

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13620H vs Xeon W-1390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13620H vs Xeon W-1390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13620H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,804 vs 23,902).

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Core i7-13620H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13620H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13620H better than Xeon W-1390?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1390 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13620H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1390 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13620H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1390 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13620H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $494 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-1390 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon W-1390 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13620H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13620H vs Xeon W-1390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13620H

The Core i7-13620H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,804 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon W-1390

The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13620H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13620H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13620H versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-13620H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1390 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13620H scores 23,804 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-1390. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13620H vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390.

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Xeon W-1390
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	23,804	23,902
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,176	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,859	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,766	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13620H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Xeon W-1390
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13620H) / not specified (Xeon W-1390). The Core i7-13620H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (64EU)), while the Xeon W-1390 requires a dedicated GPU.