Core i7-13620H vs Xeon E5-2679 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13620H vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13620H vs Xeon E5-2679 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13620H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (64EU), while Xeon E5-2679 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,766 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Core i7-13620H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13620H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13620H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13620H better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2679 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13620H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13620H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2679 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13620H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2679 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon E5-2679 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13620H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13620H vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13620H

The Core i7-13620H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,804 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13620H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13620H versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 39% clock advantage for the Core i7-13620H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-13620H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13620H scores 23,804 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2679 v4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,859 vs 1,000, a 60.1% lead for the Core i7-13620H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,766 vs 12,000 (2% advantage for the Xeon E5-2679 v4). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13620H vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	20 / 40+100%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+48%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	50 MB+108%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	5 MB+150%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	23,804	24,131+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,176	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,859+86%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,766	12,000+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13620H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i7-13620H versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — the Core i7-13620H supports 116.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2679 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13620H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2679 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13620H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2679 v4) — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13620H) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2679 v4).

Feature	Core i7-13620H	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+117%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	1536 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13620H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13620H) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4). The Core i7-13620H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (64EU)), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.