Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 4345P

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 4345P Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700

16 / 24

36,230

+0.6%

36,006

0.0%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 4345P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 4345P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4345P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4345P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.3 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

EPYC 4345P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (36,006 vs 36,230).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4345P better than Core i7-13700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4345P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4345P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4345P comes in $55 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $384 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-13700 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 16.0% better value on MSRP (109.4 vs 94.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4345P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 4345P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700

The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.

EPYC 4345P

The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 4345P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 versus 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P — a 5.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4345P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700 scores 36,230 against the EPYC 4345P's 36,006 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-13700. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P.

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 4345P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz	5.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Grado (2025)
PassMark	36,230	36,006

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4345P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700) vs 28 (EPYC 4345P) — the EPYC 4345P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700) and AM5 (EPYC 4345P).

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 4345P
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700) and AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4345P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488.

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 4345P
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, IOMMU

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700 was priced at $384, while the EPYC 4345P came in at $329. On launch pricing ($384 vs $329), EPYC 4345P was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700 delivers 94.3 pts/$ vs 109.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4345P — making the EPYC 4345P the 14.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 4345P
MSRP	$384	$329-14%
Performance per Dollar	94.3	109.4+16%
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i7-13700 on Amazon

Search EPYC 4345P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.