Core i7-13700 vs Xeon E7-8867 v3

Intel

Core i7-13700

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-8867 v3

16 Cores32 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-13700 vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700 vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700 vs Xeon E7-8867 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,288 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1094.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.3 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E7-8867 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (36,230 vs 36,908).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 45 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8867 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-8867 v3

2015

Why buy it

  • +1.9% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($4,672 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
  • 153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700 better than Xeon E7-8867 v3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8867 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8867 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 30 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13700 is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700 comes in $4,288 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $4,672 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7-8867 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.9% better PassMark. It is also 1094.3% better value on MSRP (94.3 vs 7.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700 vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-13700

The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.

Intel

Xeon E7-8867 v3

The Xeon E7-8867 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,908 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon E7-8867 v3's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — a 44.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700 scores 36,230 against the Xeon E7-8867 v3's 36,908 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E7-8867 v3. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8867 v3.

FeatureCore i7-13700Xeon E7-8867 v3
Cores / Threads
16 / 24
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+58%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
45 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
256K (per core)+12700%
Process
Intel 7 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Haswell-EX (2015)
PassMark
36,230
36,908+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
850
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700 versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — the Core i7-13700 supports 200.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8867 v3 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8867 v3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700) vs 32 (Xeon E7-8867 v3) — the Xeon E7-8867 v3 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700) and C602J (Xeon E7-8867 v3).

FeatureCore i7-13700Xeon E7-8867 v3
Socket
LGA1700
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+200%
DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
1536 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
32+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-13700 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E7-8867 v3 targets Server.

FeatureCore i7-13700Xeon E7-8867 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700 was priced at $384, while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 came in at $4672. On launch pricing ($384 vs $4672), Core i7-13700 was $4288 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700 delivers 94.3 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — making the Core i7-13700 the 169.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-13700Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP
$384-92%
$4672
Performance per Dollar
94.3+1094%
7.9
Release Date
2023
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.