Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 8124P

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 8124P Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700

16 / 24

36,230

+0.4%

36,079

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 8124P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 8124P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.3 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 8124P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅380% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,079 vs 36,230).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700 better than EPYC 8124P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8124P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700 is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700 comes in $255 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $639 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 67.1% better value on MSRP (94.3 vs 56.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i7-13700 vs EPYC 8124P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700

The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 8124P's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). The Core i7-13700 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 8124P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700 scores 36,230 against the EPYC 8124P's 36,079 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-13700. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P.

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 8124P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+73%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.45 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	36,230	36,079

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 8124P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8124P — the Core i7-13700 supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700) vs 6 (EPYC 8124P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700) vs 96 (EPYC 8124P) — the EPYC 8124P offers 76 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700) and SP6 (EPYC 8124P).

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 8124P
Socket	LGA1700	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	96+380%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P). The Core i7-13700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 8124P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 8124P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, IOMMU

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700 was priced at $384, while the EPYC 8124P came in at $639. On launch pricing ($384 vs $639), Core i7-13700 was $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700 delivers 94.3 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 8124P — making the Core i7-13700 the 50.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700	EPYC 8124P
MSRP	$384-40%	$639
Performance per Dollar	94.3+67%	56.5
Release Date	2023	2023

Search Core i7-13700 on Amazon

Search EPYC 8124P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.