Core i7-13700 vs Xeon w5-3425

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700 vs Xeon w5-3425 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700 vs Xeon w5-3425: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $805 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 210.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.3 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon w5-3425 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-3425.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3425, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (36,178 vs 36,230).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700 better than Xeon w5-3425?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w5-3425 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700 is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700 comes in $805 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $1,189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 210.1% better value on MSRP (94.3 vs 30.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-13700 vs Xeon w5-3425 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700

The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.

Xeon w5-3425

The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700 scores 36,230 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-13700. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700 vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-3425.

Feature	Core i7-13700	Xeon w5-3425
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+13%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	30 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	36,230	36,178

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3425 — the Core i7-13700 supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 92 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).

Feature	Core i7-13700	Xeon w5-3425
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+17%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	112+460%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon w5-3425 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i7-13700	Xeon w5-3425
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700 was priced at $384, while the Xeon w5-3425 came in at $1189. On launch pricing ($384 vs $1189), Core i7-13700 was $805 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700 delivers 94.3 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3425 — making the Core i7-13700 the 102.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700	Xeon w5-3425
MSRP	$384-68%	$1189
Performance per Dollar	94.3+210%	30.4
Release Date	2023	2023

Search Core i7-13700 on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3425 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.