PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700HX vs Core Ultra 5 225F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700HX vs Core Ultra 5 225F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.3 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($485 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).

Core Ultra 5 225F

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $254 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 66.3 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (31,541 vs 32,157).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Core Ultra 5 225F?

Yes. Core i7-13700HX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core Ultra 5 225F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13700HX comes in 110.0% more expensive on MSRP at $485 MSRP versus $231 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 225F is also 105.9% better value on MSRP (136.5 vs 66.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700HX vs Core Ultra 5 225F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700HX

The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Core Ultra 5 225F

The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 31,541 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Core Ultra 5 225F
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+60%	10 / 10
Boost Clock	5 GHz+2%	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+50%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+50%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	32,157+2%	31,541
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	17,050
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,653
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	13,028

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225F — the Core Ultra 5 225F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225F) — the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F).

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Core Ultra 5 225F
Socket	FCBGA1964	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Core Ultra 5 225F requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Core Ultra 5 225F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700HX was priced at $485, while the Core Ultra 5 225F came in at $231. On launch pricing ($485 vs $231), Core Ultra 5 225F was $254 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700HX delivers 66.3 pts/$ vs 136.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225F — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 69.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP	$485	$231-52%
Performance per Dollar	66.3	136.5+106%
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i7-13700HX on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 5 225F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.