Core i7-3667U
VS
A8-8600P

Core i7-3667U vs A8-8600P

Intel

Core i7-3667U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A8-8600P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3667U is positioned at rank 1197 and the A8-8600P is on rank 948, so the A8-8600P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3667U

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5383%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5305%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4870%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4848%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4803%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4639%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4448%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4440%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4321%
#1197
Core i7-3667U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1198
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1199
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1200
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1201
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1202
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
94%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
94%
#1204
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1205
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
93%
#1206
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1207
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
90%
#1208
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1210
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
#1211
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-8600P

#936
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1786%
#937
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1760%
#938
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1615%
#939
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1608%
#940
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1593%
#942
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1539%
#943
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1475%
#944
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1473%
#945
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1433%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
98%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3667U leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-8600P is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-3667UA8-8600P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3667UA8-8600P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3667U and A8-8600P

Intel

Core i7-3667U

The Core i7-3667U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,451 points. Launch price was $346.

AMD

A8-8600P

The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3667U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-8600P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3667U versus 3 GHz on the A8-8600P — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3667U (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i7-3667U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the A8-8600P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3667U scores 2,451 against the A8-8600P's 2,464 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-8600P.

FeatureCore i7-3667UA8-8600P
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+25%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
2,451
2,464
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,160
Geekbench 6 Single
499
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3667U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-8600P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-3667U versus DDR3-2133 on the A8-8600P — the Core i7-3667U supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3667U supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3667U) vs 12 (A8-8600P) — the Core i7-3667U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3667U) and SoC (A8-8600P).

FeatureCore i7-3667UA8-8600P
Socket
BGA1023
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+53233%
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32
16 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-3667U) vs AMD-V (A8-8600P). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3667U) and Radeon R6 (A8-8600P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3667U rivals AMD A10-4655M; A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U.

FeatureCore i7-3667UA8-8600P
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Radeon R6
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Laptop