Core i7-3667U
VS
Core i3-3250

Core i7-3667U vs Core i3-3250

Intel

Core i7-3667U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-3250

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3667U is positioned at rank 1197 and the Core i3-3250 is on rank 846, so the Core i3-3250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3667U

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5383%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5305%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4870%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4848%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4803%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4639%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4448%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4440%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4321%
#1197
Core i7-3667U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1198
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1199
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1200
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1201
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1202
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
94%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
94%
#1204
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1205
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
93%
#1206
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1207
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
90%
#1208
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1210
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
#1211
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17483%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16519%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11994%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3613%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2862%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2504%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1415%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1289%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1289%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1274%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1240%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1222%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1218%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1207%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
100%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3250 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-3667U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-3667UCore i3-3250
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3667UCore i3-3250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3667U and Core i3-3250

Intel

Core i7-3667U

The Core i7-3667U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,451 points. Launch price was $346.

Intel

Core i3-3250

The Core i3-3250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $138.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3667U and Core i3-3250 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3667U versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-3250 — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i3-3250 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-3667U scores 2,451 against the Core i3-3250's 2,460 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-3250. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3667U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250.

FeatureCore i7-3667UCore i3-3250
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,451
2,460
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3667U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3250 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3667UCore i3-3250
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-3667U) / not specified (Core i3-3250). The Core i7-3667U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i3-3250 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3667U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureCore i7-3667UCore i3-3250
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true