Core i7-4510U vs FX-4100

Core i7-4510U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014

FX-4100

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-4510U

2 / 4

2,634

+0.2%

2,630

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4510U is positioned at rank 66 and the FX-4100 is on rank 728, so the Core i7-4510U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4510U

#14

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#15

Ryzen 5 220

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#18

Ryzen 5 8500G

MSRP: $179|Avg: $150

91%

#54

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

223%

#55

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

220%

#56

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

202%

#57

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

201%

#58

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

199%

#60

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

192%

#61

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

184%

#62

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

184%

#63

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

179%

#66

Core i7-4510U

MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A

100%

#69

Core 2 Quad Q9100

MSRP: $14|Avg: $14

98%

#75

Core i3-4030U

MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A

95%

#79

Atom D2500

MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4100

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

13630%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

12879%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

9351%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

2817%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

2231%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

1952%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

1118%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

1103%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

1005%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

1005%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

993%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

967%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

953%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

949%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

941%

#728

FX-4100

MSRP: $115|Avg: $20

100%

#729

Core i5-7440EQ

MSRP: $250|Avg: $30

100%

#730

Core i5-3350P

MSRP: $189|Avg: $25

100%

#732

Core i3-4350T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $20

100%

#733

Athlon II X4 641

MSRP: $102|Avg: $102

99%

#734

Athlon II X3 460

MSRP: $87|Avg: $15

99%

#735

Pentium G2100T

MSRP: $75|Avg: $10

99%

#736

Core i5-3330

MSRP: $182|Avg: $21

99%

#737

Core i3-4330T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $15

98%

#738

Pentium E5300

MSRP: $62|Avg: $25

98%

#739

Athlon II X2 215

MSRP: $45|Avg: $10

98%

#740

Core i7-4790S

MSRP: $312|Avg: $60

98%

#741

Pentium G2020T

MSRP: $64|Avg: $69

98%

#742

FX-6100

MSRP: $165|Avg: $25

98%

#743

Core i7-4771

MSRP: $320|Avg: $78

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-4100 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-4510U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Core i7-4510U	FX-4100
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($393)	✅ More affordable ($20)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the FX-4100 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 95% cheaper ($20 vs $393) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Core i7-4510U	FX-4100
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+1862%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($393)	✅ More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-4510U Benchmark Check

FX-4100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4510U and FX-4100

Core i7-4510U

The Core i7-4510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,634 points. Launch price was $393.

FX-4100

The FX-4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,630 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4510U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4100 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-4510U versus 3.8 GHz on the FX-4100 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the FX-4100 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4510U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4510U scores 2,634 against the FX-4100's 2,630 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4510U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-4510U vs 8192 kB on the FX-4100.

Feature	Core i7-4510U	FX-4100
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8192 kB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	2,634	2,630
Geekbench 6 Single	880	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4510U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4510U	FX-4100
Socket	FCBGA1168	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	❌	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4510U) / not specified (FX-4100). The Core i7-4510U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the FX-4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4510U targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-4510U rivals A10-7300.