
Core i7-4510U

Xeon E5-2407
Core i7-4510U vs Xeon E5-2407 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4510U vs Xeon E5-2407 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4510U vs Xeon E5-2407: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4510U
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Xeon E5-2407 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2407 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,634 vs 2,659).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2407, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 10.6 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Xeon E5-2407
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
- ✅Costs $143 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4510U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2407 better than Core i7-4510U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4510U vs Xeon E5-2407 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4510U
The Core i7-4510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,634 points. Launch price was $393.

Xeon E5-2407
The Xeon E5-2407 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $335.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4510U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2407 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2407 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-4510U versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 — a 34% clock advantage for the Core i7-4510U (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-4510U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4510U scores 2,634 against the Xeon E5-2407's 2,659 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2407. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-4510U vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Xeon E5-2407 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 10240 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 2,634 | 2,659 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 880 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4510U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Xeon E5-2407 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4510U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407). The Core i7-4510U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Xeon E5-2407 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4510U targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-4510U rivals A10-7300.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Xeon E5-2407 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4400 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Ultrabook | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4510U was priced at $393, while the Xeon E5-2407 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($393 vs $250), Xeon E5-2407 was $143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4510U delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 10.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2407 — making the Xeon E5-2407 the 45.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Xeon E5-2407 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $393 | $250-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 10.6+58% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














