
Core i7-4510U

Pro A12-8800B
Core i7-4510U vs Pro A12-8800B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4510U vs Pro A12-8800B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Core i7-4510U vs Pro A12-8800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4510U
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($393 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pro A12-8800B across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,634 vs 2,667).
- ❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
Pro A12-8800B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌1.8% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$393 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Pro A12-8800B better than Core i7-4510U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4510U vs Pro A12-8800B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4510U
The Core i7-4510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,634 points. Launch price was $393.

Pro A12-8800B
The Pro A12-8800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4510U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A12-8800B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A12-8800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-4510U versus 3.4 GHz on the Pro A12-8800B — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Pro A12-8800B (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4510U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A12-8800B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4510U scores 2,634 against the Pro A12-8800B's 2,667 — a 1.2% lead for the Pro A12-8800B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 880 vs 528, a 50% lead for the Core i7-4510U that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2048 kB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-21% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 2,634 | 2,667+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 880+67% | 528 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,144 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4510U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A12-8800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4510U versus DDR3-2133 on the Pro A12-8800B — the Pro A12-8800B supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pro A12-8800B supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i7-4510U) vs 16 (Pro A12-8800B) — the Pro A12-8800B offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i7-4510U) and Socket FP4 (Pro A12-8800B).
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4510U) vs AMD-V (Pro A12-8800B). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4400 (Core i7-4510U) and Radeon R7 Graphics (Pro A12-8800B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4510U targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-4510U rivals A10-7300.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4400 | Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Ultrabook | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4510U was priced at $393, while the Pro A12-8800B came in at $400. On launch pricing ($393 vs $400), Core i7-4510U was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4510U delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Pro A12-8800B — making the Core i7-4510U the 0.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pro A12-8800B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $393-2% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















