
Core i7-4510U

Pentium B940
Core i7-4510U vs Pentium B940 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4510U vs Pentium B940 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4510U vs Pentium B940: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4510U
2014Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Pentium B940 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
Pentium B940
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $259 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,610 vs 2,634).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4510U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4510U better than Pentium B940?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4510U vs Pentium B940 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4510U
The Core i7-4510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,634 points. Launch price was $393.

Pentium B940
The Pentium B940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,610 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4510U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium B940's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-4510U versus 2 GHz on the Pentium B940 — a 43.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4510U (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-4510U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium B940 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4510U scores 2,634 against the Pentium B940's 2,610 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-4510U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-4510U vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B940.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+55% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,634 | 2,610 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 880 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4510U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium B940 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4510U) / not specified (Pentium B940). The Core i7-4510U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Pentium B940 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4510U targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-4510U rivals A10-7300.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4400 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Ultrabook | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4510U was priced at $393, while the Pentium B940 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($393 vs $134), Pentium B940 was $259 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4510U delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Pentium B940 — making the Pentium B940 the 97.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4510U | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $393 | $134-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 19.5+191% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














