Core i7-4700EQ vs N100

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

N100

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4700EQ vs N100 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4700EQ vs N100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4700EQ vs N100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4700EQ

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while N100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 41.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
  • 683.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 6W.
  • Older platform position on BGA1364, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N100

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 191.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Draws 6W instead of 47W, a 41W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1364 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,355 vs 5,417).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4700EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4700EQ better than N100?
Yes. Core i7-4700EQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4700EQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4700EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4700EQ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-4700EQ comes in 195.3% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. N100 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 13.2% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
N100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1364. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-4700EQ vs N100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

N100

The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4700EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the N100's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ versus 3.4 GHz on the N100 — identical boost frequencies. The Core i7-4700EQ is built on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-4700EQ scores 5,417 against the N100's 5,355 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQN100
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)+33%
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,417+1%
5,355
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4700EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N100 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQN100
Socket
BGA1364
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ) / not specified (N100). The Core i7-4700EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the N100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQN100
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4700EQ was priced at $378, while the N100 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($378 vs $128), N100 was $250 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4700EQ delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 41.8 pts/$ for the N100 — making the N100 the 97.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQN100
MSRP
$378
$128-66%
Performance per Dollar
14.3
41.8+192%
Release Date
2013
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.