Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1240

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4700EQ

2013

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 47W instead of 80W, a 33W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E3-1240 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).

Xeon E3-1240

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $105 less on MSRP ($273 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 37.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,361 vs 5,417).
  • 70.2% higher power demand at 80W vs 47W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4700EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4700EQ better than Xeon E3-1240?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4700EQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4700EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4700EQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1240 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4700EQ comes in 38.5% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $273 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1240 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1240 is also 37.0% better value on MSRP (19.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4700EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E3-1240

The Xeon E3-1240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $209.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E3-1240 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4700EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700EQ scores 5,417 against the Xeon E3-1240's 5,361 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQXeon E3-1240
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
5,417+1%
5,361
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4700EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQXeon E3-1240
Socket
BGA1364
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240). The Core i7-4700EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E3-1240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQXeon E3-1240
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4700EQ was priced at $378, while the Xeon E3-1240 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($378 vs $273), Xeon E3-1240 was $105 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4700EQ delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 19.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1240 — making the Xeon E3-1240 the 31.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4700EQXeon E3-1240
MSRP
$378
$273-28%
Performance per Dollar
14.3
19.6+37%
Release Date
2013
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.