Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Xeon E3-1240

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-4700EQ

4 / 8

5,417

+1.0%

5,361

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4700EQ is positioned at rank 994 and the Xeon E3-1240 is on rank 627, so the Xeon E3-1240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700EQ

#982

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

2047%

#983

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

2017%

#984

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1852%

#985

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1844%

#986

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1827%

#988

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1764%

#989

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1692%

#990

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1689%

#991

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1643%

#994

Core i7-4700EQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $180

100%

#995

Core i3-8145UE

MSRP: $281|Avg: $50

100%

#996

Core i7-4712MQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $60

98%

#997

Core i7-3615QE

MSRP: $400|Avg: $100

98%

#998

Celeron M U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

98%

#999

3015Ce

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#1000

Core i7-4700MQ

MSRP: $383|Avg: $50

97%

#1001

Athlon II M340

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

97%

#1005

Pentium P6000

MSRP: $150|Avg: $90

95%

#1007

Core i7-3630QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

95%

#1008

Core i7-3610QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

95%

#1009

Core i3-1115GRE

MSRP: $338|Avg: $480

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

10582%

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

1998%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

1775%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

1371%

#374

Xeon Gold 6448H

MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A

100%

#375

Xeon D-2766NT

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212

100%

#376

Xeon Gold 6442Y

MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A

99%

#377

Xeon 6740P

MSRP: $4650|Avg: $4650

99%

#378

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

MSRP: $7999|Avg: $7999

98%

#379

Xeon W-3345

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $3319

98%

#380

Xeon Gold 6526Y

MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A

97%

#382

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A

95%

#627

Xeon E3-1240

MSRP: $273|Avg: $39

100%

#636

Xeon E5-2680 v2

MSRP: $667|Avg: $462

97%

#640

Xeon W-2104

MSRP: $294|Avg: $309

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($39) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1240 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	Core i7-4700EQ	Xeon E3-1240
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($180)	✅ More affordable ($39)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4700EQ ($180), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($141 less, 362% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	Core i7-4700EQ	Xeon E3-1240
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+357%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($180)	✅ More affordable ($39)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-4700EQ Benchmark Check

Xeon E3-1240 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E3-1240

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240

The Xeon E3-1240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E3-1240 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4700EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700EQ scores 5,417 against the Xeon E3-1240's 5,361 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240.

Feature	Core i7-4700EQ	Xeon E3-1240
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	5,417+1%	5,361

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4700EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4700EQ	Xeon E3-1240
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	✅	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240). The Core i7-4700EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E3-1240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i7-4700EQ	Xeon E3-1240
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4700EQ launched at $378 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1240 debuted at $273. At current prices ($180 vs $39), the Xeon E3-1240 is $141 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4700EQ delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 137.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1240 — making the Xeon E3-1240 the 128.2% better value option.