
Core i7-4700EQ

Xeon E3-1240
Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4700EQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 80W, a 33W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E3-1240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
Xeon E3-1240
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $105 less on MSRP ($273 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,361 vs 5,417).
- ❌70.2% higher power demand at 80W vs 47W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4700EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4700EQ better than Xeon E3-1240?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4700EQ vs Xeon E3-1240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4700EQ
The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240
The Xeon E3-1240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E3-1240 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4700EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700EQ scores 5,417 against the Xeon E3-1240's 5,361 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,417+1% | 5,361 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4700EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240). The Core i7-4700EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E3-1240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4700EQ was priced at $378, while the Xeon E3-1240 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($378 vs $273), Xeon E3-1240 was $105 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4700EQ delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 19.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1240 — making the Xeon E3-1240 the 31.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4700EQ | Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $273-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 19.6+37% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














