Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4800MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 47W instead of 73W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $380 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1225 v6

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4800MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,740 vs 5,773).
❌55.3% higher power demand at 73W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4800MQ better than Xeon E3-1225 v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4800MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4800MQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4800MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4800MQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-4800MQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $380 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1225 v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E3-1225 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E3-1225 v6

The Xeon E3-1225 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,740 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4800MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1225 v6's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v6 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Xeon E3-1225 v6's 5,740 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-4800MQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1225 v6.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Xeon E3-1225 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.3 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,773	5,740

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.