Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon E3-1220 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon E3-1220 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon E3-1220 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $78 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $372 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.9 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $372 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 72W, a 47W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,550 vs 5,589).

Xeon E3-1220 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6822EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($372 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
❌188% higher power demand at 72W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6822EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6822EQ better than Xeon E3-1220 v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6822EQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1220 v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6822EQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-6822EQ comes in $78 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $372 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1220 v6 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 25.6% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 15.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1220 v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon E3-1220 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E3-1220 v6

The Xeon E3-1220 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,589 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6822EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1220 v6's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v6 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220 v6. The Core i7-6822EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6822EQ scores 5,550 against the Xeon E3-1220 v6's 5,589 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E3-1220 v6. Both processors carry 8 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Xeon E3-1220 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	8 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,550	5,589
Geekbench 6 Single	684	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,796	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220 v6). The Core i7-6822EQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E3-1220 v6 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Xeon E3-1220 v6
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6822EQ was priced at $294, while the Xeon E3-1220 v6 came in at $372. On launch pricing ($294 vs $372), Core i7-6822EQ was $78 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6822EQ delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 15.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220 v6 — making the Core i7-6822EQ the 22.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Xeon E3-1220 v6
MSRP	$294-21%	$372
Performance per Dollar	18.9+26%	15.0
Release Date	2015	2017

Search Core i7-6822EQ on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1220 v6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.