Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon W-2104

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon W-2104 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon W-2104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 25W instead of 120W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 530, while Xeon W-2104 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-2104

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6822EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,530 vs 5,550).
❌380% higher power demand at 120W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6822EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6822EQ better than Xeon W-2104?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2104 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6822EQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6822EQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6822EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6822EQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-6822EQ comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $294 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.4% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 18.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Xeon W-2104 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon W-2104

The Xeon W-2104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,530 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6822EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon W-2104's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2104 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2104. The Core i7-6822EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6822EQ scores 5,550 against the Xeon W-2104's 5,530 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-6822EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2104.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Xeon W-2104
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	8.25 MB (total)+3%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,550	5,530
Geekbench 6 Single	684	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,796	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ) / not specified (Xeon W-2104). The Core i7-6822EQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon W-2104 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Xeon W-2104
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6822EQ was priced at $294, while the Xeon W-2104 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($294 vs $294), Xeon W-2104 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6822EQ delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 18.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2104 — making the Core i7-6822EQ the 0.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Xeon W-2104
MSRP	$294	$294
Performance per Dollar	18.9	18.8
Release Date	2015	2017

Search Core i7-6822EQ on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2104 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.