Core i7-740QM vs Xeon L5410

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-740QM vs Xeon L5410 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-740QM vs Xeon L5410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-740QM

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 50W, a 5W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,842 vs 1,853).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Xeon L5410 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon L5410

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-740QM better than Xeon L5410?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5410 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-740QM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5410 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-740QM is the better buy right now. Core i7-740QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $378 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon L5410 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-740QM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-740QM vs Xeon L5410 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-740QM

The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.

Xeon L5410

The Xeon L5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 March 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,853 points. Launch price was $320.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-740QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon L5410's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon L5410 — a 159.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-740QM (base: 1.73 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Core i7-740QM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon L5410 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-740QM scores 1,842 against the Xeon L5410's 1,853 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon L5410. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5410.

Feature	Core i7-740QM	Xeon L5410
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.93 GHz+788%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	1.73 GHz	2.33 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	6 MB (total)+2300%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Clarksfield (2009−2010)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,842	1,853

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-740QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5410 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.