Core i7-7700 vs Core i3-10100F
Core i7-7700
Core i3-10100F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-7700 is positioned at rank #574 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7700
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10100F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-7700 | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-7700 | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+106%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7700 and Core i3-10100F
Core i7-7700
The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.
Core i3-10100F
The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-7700 and Core i3-10100F share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-7700 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-10100F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700 scores 8,642 against the Core i3-10100F's 8,714 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-10100F. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700 vs 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 8,642 | 8,714 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,435 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10100F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Core i3-10100F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,200-series (Core i7-7700) and Intel 400 series (Core i3-10100F).
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700) / not specified (Core i3-10100F). The Core i7-7700 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i3-10100F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-7700 launched at $272 MSRP, while the Core i3-10100F debuted at $88. At current prices ($102 vs $50), the Core i3-10100F is $52 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700 delivers 84.7 pts/$ vs 174.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-10100F — making the Core i3-10100F the 69.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7700 | Core i3-10100F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $272 | $88-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $102 | $50-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.7 | 174.3+106% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-7700 and Core i3-10100F
