Core i7-7820EQ
VS
Ryzen 9 5900X

Core i7-7820EQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Core i7-7820EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-7820EQ is positioned at rank #889 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7820EQ

#877
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1485%
#878
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1463%
#879
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1343%
#880
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1337%
#881
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1325%
#883
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1279%
#884
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1227%
#885
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1225%
#886
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1192%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
100%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
100%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
99%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
99%
#896
Core i5-8305G
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
98%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 5900X

#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
105%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
104%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
103%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
103%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
103%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
103%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
102%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
102%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
102%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
101%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
101%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
101%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
101%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
100%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
100%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
100%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
100%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
99%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
99%
#162
Core i3-13100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $128
99%
#163
Core i9-10910
MSRP: $488|Avg: $200
96%
#164
Core i5-14600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
96%
#165
Core i5-11500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
95%
#166
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#167
Ryzen 3 8300GE
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
95%
#168
Core i3-13100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $122
94%
#169
Core i5-10600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $110
94%
#170
Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $67
94%
#171
Core Ultra 9 285
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 9 5900X delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-7820EQ in both compute-intensive tasks (135.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-7820EQRyzen 9 5900X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($350)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Ryzen 9 5900X leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 7% cheaper ($350 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-7820EQRyzen 9 5900X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+463%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7820EQ and Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Processing Power

The Core i7-7820EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 43% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X. The Core i7-7820EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820EQ scores 7,470 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 135.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

FeatureCore i7-7820EQRyzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.8 GHz+55%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB
64 MB+700%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
7,470
38,955+421%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,888
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-7820EQ) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

FeatureCore i7-7820EQRyzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-7820EQ launched at $378 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. At current prices ($378 vs $350), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $28 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820EQ delivers 19.8 pts/$ vs 111.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 139.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-7820EQRyzen 9 5900X
MSRP
$378-31%
$549
Avg Price (30d)
$378
$350-7%
Performance per Dollar
19.8
111.3+462%
Release Date
2017
2020