Core i7-8809G
VS
Core i7-3970X

Core i7-8809G vs Core i7-3970X

Intel

Core i7-8809G

4 Cores8 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-3970X

6 Cores12 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-8809G is positioned at rank 904 and the Core i7-3970X is on rank 1020, so the Core i7-8809G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-8809G

#892
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1563%
#893
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1540%
#894
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1414%
#895
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1408%
#896
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1395%
#898
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1347%
#899
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1291%
#900
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1289%
#901
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1255%
#904
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
100%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
99%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3970X

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
36078%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
34090%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24752%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7457%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5907%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5167%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2959%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2921%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2659%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2659%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2630%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2559%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2523%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2513%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2490%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
89%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
100%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
100%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
99%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
97%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
97%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
94%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
93%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
93%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
93%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
93%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
90%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
90%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-8809G (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-8809GCore i7-3970X
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($450)
More affordable ($60)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake G (2018) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3970X (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-8809GCore i7-3970X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+659%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($450)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-8809G and Core i7-3970X

Intel

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-3970X

The Core i7-3970X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,554 points. Launch price was $593.

Processing Power

The Core i7-8809G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-3970X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-3970X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-3970X — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-8809G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-8809G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3970X uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8809G scores 8,448 against the Core i7-3970X's 8,554 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3970X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G vs 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3970X.

FeatureCore i7-8809GCore i7-3970X
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+5%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake G (2018)
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
PassMark
8,448
8,554+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
742
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8809G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3970X uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-8809GCore i7-3970X
Socket
FCBGA2270
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-8809G) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3970X). Primary use case: Core i7-3970X targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3970X rivals FX-9590.

FeatureCore i7-8809GCore i7-3970X
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
HEDT Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-8809G launched at $450 MSRP, while the Core i7-3970X debuted at $990. At current prices ($450 vs $60), the Core i7-3970X is $390 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-8809G delivers 18.8 pts/$ vs 142.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-3970X — making the Core i7-3970X the 153.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-8809GCore i7-3970X
MSRP
$450-55%
$990
Avg Price (30d)
$450
$60-87%
Performance per Dollar
18.8
142.6+659%
Release Date
2018
2012