Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 4700GE

Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 4700GE Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900F

10 / 20

19,800

+0.8%

19,636

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 4700GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 4700GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 4700GE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($464 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 4700GE

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-10900F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10900F better than Ryzen 7 4700GE?

Yes. Core i9-10900F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 28.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10900F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 28.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10900F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 4700GE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-10900F comes in 55.2% more expensive on MSRP at $464 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 4700GE is also 53.9% better value on MSRP (65.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 4700GE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10900F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 4700GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 4700GE

The Ryzen 7 4700GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,636 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900F packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700GE — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i9-10900F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900F scores 19,800 against the Ryzen 7 4700GE's 19,636 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10900F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 4700GE.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+19%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+150%	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	19,800	19,636
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,701	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,456	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4700GE). Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-10900F was priced at $464, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE came in at $299. On launch pricing ($464 vs $299), Ryzen 7 4700GE was $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900F delivers 42.7 pts/$ vs 65.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 4700GE — making the Ryzen 7 4700GE the 42.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP	$464	$299-36%
Performance per Dollar	42.7	65.7+54%
Release Date	2020	2020

Search Core i9-10900F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 4700GE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.