Core i9-10900F vs Xeon W-1350P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900F vs Xeon W-1350P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900F vs Xeon W-1350P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-1350P.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 63.1 PassMark/$ ($464 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).

Xeon W-1350P

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($311 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.1 vs 42.7 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,611 vs 19,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-10900F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10900F better than Xeon W-1350P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1350P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-10900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10900F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 32.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10900F is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1350P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-10900F comes in 49.2% more expensive on MSRP at $464 MSRP versus $311 MSRP, and it still gives you a 32.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1350P is also 47.8% better value on MSRP (63.1 vs 42.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1350P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-10900F vs Xeon W-1350P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1350P

The Xeon W-1350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,611 points. Launch price was $311.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900F packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-1350P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1350P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-10900F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1350P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900F scores 19,800 against the Xeon W-1350P's 19,611 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-10900F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350P.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Xeon W-1350P
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	4 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+67%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	19,800	19,611
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,701	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,456	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 4.0.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Xeon W-1350P
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900F) / not specified (Xeon W-1350P). Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Xeon W-1350P
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-10900F was priced at $464, while the Xeon W-1350P came in at $311. On launch pricing ($464 vs $311), Xeon W-1350P was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900F delivers 42.7 pts/$ vs 63.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350P — making the Xeon W-1350P the 38.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Xeon W-1350P
MSRP	$464	$311-33%
Performance per Dollar	42.7	63.1+48%
Release Date	2020	2021

Search Core i9-10900F on Amazon

Search Xeon W-1350P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.