
Core i9-13950HX vs Xeon Gold 6416H

Core i9-13950HX

Xeon Gold 6416H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13950HX
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6416H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-13950HX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,845) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-13950HX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+836%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,845) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13950HX and Xeon Gold 6416H

Core i9-13950HX
The Core i9-13950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,012 points. Launch price was $590.

Xeon Gold 6416H
The Xeon Gold 6416H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,606 points. Launch price was $1,444.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13950HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6416H offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Core i9-13950HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13950HX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6416H — a 26.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13950HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i9-13950HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13950HX scores 41,012 against the Xeon Gold 6416H's 40,606 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-13950HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13950HX vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6416H.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+33% | 18 / 36 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+31% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 45 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 41,012 | 40,606 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13950HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13950HX versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6416H — the Core i9-13950HX supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6416H supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6416H). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6416H) — the Xeon Gold 6416H offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13950HX) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 6416H).
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+17% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 80+300% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13950HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13950HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6416H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13950HX rivals M3 Max 16-Core; Xeon Gold 6416H rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13950HX launched at $590 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6416H debuted at $1845.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $590-68% | $1845 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















