Core i9-14901E vs Ryzen 5 3600

CPU

GPU

Core i9-14901E

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-14901E vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-14901E

8 / 16

30,298

+71.3%

17,685

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14901E vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14901E vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14901E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $358 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-14901E.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14901E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 14,262).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14901E better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Yes. Core i9-14901E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 651.4% better Geekbench multi-core, 71.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14901E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14901E is the stronger fit. You are getting 651.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14901E is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-14901E comes in 179.9% more expensive on MSRP at $557 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 63.4% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 54.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 3600 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14901E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14901E vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14901E

The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14901E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-14901E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-14901E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14901E scores 30,298 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 52.6% lead for the Core i9-14901E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,894 vs 1,295, a 76.3% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,262 vs 1,898 (153% advantage for the Core i9-14901E). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i9-14901E	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+33%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+13%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	10 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	30,298+71%	17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,894+123%	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,262+651%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14901E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Core i9-14901E supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14901E supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14901E) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	Core i9-14901E	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support Yes virtualization. The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Core i9-14901E	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	Yes
Target Use	—	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-14901E was priced at $557, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($557 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $358 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14901E delivers 54.4 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 48.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-14901E	Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP	$557	$199-64%
Performance per Dollar	54.4	88.9+63%
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Core i9-14901E on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.