
Core i9-7920X

Ryzen 7 3800XT
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 3800XT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 3800XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 3800XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 199.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 23,508).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3800XT better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 3800XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.


Ryzen 7 3800XT
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3800XT (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 7 3800XT's 23,441 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total) | 32 MB+94% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 23,508 | 23,441 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7920X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-7920X was priced at $1199, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT came in at $399. On launch pricing ($1199 vs $399), Ryzen 7 3800XT was $800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7920X delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 58.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3800XT — making the Ryzen 7 3800XT the 99.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $399-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 58.7+199% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













