Core i9-7920X vs Xeon W-2175

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-7920X vs Xeon W-2175 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-7920X vs Xeon W-2175: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $748 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2175 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Xeon W-2175

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,507 vs 23,508).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($1,947 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-7920X better than Xeon W-2175?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2175 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-7920X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7920X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-7920X is the better buy right now. Core i9-7920X comes in $748 cheaper on MSRP at $1,199 MSRP versus $1,947 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-2175 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 62.4% better value on MSRP (19.6 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2175 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i9-7920X vs Xeon W-2175 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-7920X

The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Xeon W-2175

The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2175 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-7920X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 0% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.

Feature	Core i9-7920X	Xeon W-2175
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	14 / 28+17%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+2%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16.5 MB (total)	19.25 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	23,508	23,507

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2066 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i9-7920X	Xeon W-2175
Socket	LGA2066	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-7920X was priced at $1199, while the Xeon W-2175 came in at $1947. On launch pricing ($1199 vs $1947), Core i9-7920X was $748 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7920X delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2175 — making the Core i9-7920X the 47.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-7920X	Xeon W-2175
MSRP	$1199-38%	$1947
Performance per Dollar	19.6+62%	12.1
Release Date	2017	2017

Search Core i9-7920X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2175 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.