Core i9-7920X vs Xeon E-2388G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-7920X vs Xeon E-2388G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-7920X vs Xeon E-2388G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2388G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,572).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Xeon E-2388G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.

Xeon E-2388G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2388G better than Core i9-7920X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2388G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-7920X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2388G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 34.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2388G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2388G is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E-2388G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 34.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-7920X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (19.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2066.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2388G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-7920X vs Xeon E-2388G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-7920X

The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Xeon E-2388G

The Xeon E-2388G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,572 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E-2388G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2388G — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2388G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2388G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Xeon E-2388G's 23,572 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E-2388G. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2388G.

Feature	Core i9-7920X	Xeon E-2388G
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	16.5 MB (total)+3%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	23,508	23,572

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2388G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.