
Core i9-7920X

Ryzen 7 7735H
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 7735H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 7735H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 7735H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7735H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,619).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-7920X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7735H better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 7735H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.


Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 7 7735H's 23,619 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735H. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735H.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.75 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total)+3% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 23,508 | 23,619 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7920X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H). The Ryzen 7 7735H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i9-7920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












