
Core M-5Y10a

Ryzen 5 3600
Core M-5Y10a vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core M-5Y10a vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone
Core M-5Y10a vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core M-5Y10a
2014Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 5300, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,905 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +376.0% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1210.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core M-5Y10a can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Core M-5Y10a?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core M-5Y10a vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y10a
The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y10a packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 71% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core M-5Y10a uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10a scores 1,905 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 161.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10a vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+110% |
| Base Clock | 0.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+350% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,905 | 17,685+828% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y10a uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1600 on the Core M-5Y10a versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core M-5Y10a) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 24+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10a) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Core M-5Y10a includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5300), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 5300 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Mobile | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core M-5Y10a was priced at $281, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($281 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10a delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 171.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $199-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 88.9+1207% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














