Core M-5Y51
VS
Core 2 Duo T7300

Core M-5Y51 vs Core 2 Duo T7300

Intel

Core M-5Y51

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7300

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y51 is positioned at rank 1154 and the Core 2 Duo T7300 is on rank 283, so the Core 2 Duo T7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y51

#1141
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4064%
#1142
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4004%
#1143
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3676%
#1144
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3659%
#1145
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3626%
#1147
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3501%
#1148
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3357%
#1149
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3352%
#1150
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3262%
#1153
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
100%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1155
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
100%
#1156
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
99%
#1158
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1159
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1161
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1165
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7300

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
98%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#271
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
431%
#272
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
425%
#273
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
390%
#274
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
389%
#275
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
385%
#277
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
372%
#278
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
356%
#279
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
356%
#280
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
346%
#283
Core 2 Duo T7300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core M-5Y51 (2014) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore M-5Y51Core 2 Duo T7300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7300 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore M-5Y51Core 2 Duo T7300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y51 and Core 2 Duo T7300

Intel

Core M-5Y51

The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7300

The Core 2 Duo T7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,040 points. Launch price was $234.

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y51 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo T7300's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7300 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y51 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core M-5Y51 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7300 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y51 scores 2,030 against the Core 2 Duo T7300's 2,040 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7300. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y51 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7300.

FeatureCore M-5Y51Core 2 Duo T7300
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2 GHz+82%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-Y (2014)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
2,030
2,040
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,499
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y51 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore M-5Y51Core 2 Duo T7300
Socket
FCBGA1234
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core M-5Y51) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7300). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

FeatureCore M-5Y51Core 2 Duo T7300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget